Sent from my Android. This post made possible by qwerty. Email: don@steelid.com
Sent from my Android. This post made possible by qwerty. Email: don@steelid.com
Because all tied up in the notion of seeing/having a good eye are things like: [an innate] feel for composition and framing; [an innate] feel for how to see and use light; and also a way of seeing or viewing the world, which has as much (if not more) to do with feelings…with the stuff you carry around in your brain and your heart –like empathy, maturity, compassion and passion– as it does with the mechanics of vision.
From the comments at APhotoEditor.
by Cynthia Wood
In case you hadn't seen it before, this is how you can increase the power of your strobes with Photoshop.
1. Camera is on a tripod and does not move.
Don Giannatti:
Sent from my Android. This post made possible by qwerty. Email: don@steelid.com
Sent from my Android. This post made possible by qwerty. Email: don@steelid.com
I’ve spent quite a bit of time looking at myself lately, determining that this mentality will cause all of us to eventually self-destruct. As hurtful as this letter comes across at face value, we can never change others. We can only change ourselves and grow on a personal level as photographers, artists and business people. I’m finding out it’s not about the other people though. It’s about you and I. I’ve made the mistakes. I’ve followed the sickening trends early on and unsuspectingly listened to the masses. But I’m the only one who can do what is right for me. I need to remind myself that coming into my own isn’t an overnight process. I’ve spent thousands and thousands of hours trying to find my voice and place within the industry. I have yet to even scratch the surface and I still have thousands of hours ahead of me.
But since reality has been marginalized - partly due to the ability to reach everyone with the tiniest minutia of information without really having anything to say and the increasing importance given to naval gazing as a way of life.
In a society that has begun to lose the ability to discern between reality and fantasy, we have seen the introduction of the 'cult of personality'.
I do not know this photographer, but he seems to be discovering that being 'all that' means little if the guy looking back in the mirror doesn't believe it.
A good personal brand is a clear projection of you, what makes you an individual and what makes you different from others. Done well, it will consistently convey your unique personality and approach to those you encounter. It will help you stand out from the crowd, and hopefully mean that people think of you first when they start thinking about becoming a customer or partner.
Hopefully you don’t need to spend too much time formulating what you stand for before embarking on a mission to establish your personal brand. I believe it works best when rooted in authenticity. People have a sixth sense for what is credible and what is not. The contrived approach will ultimately smell a little bad if you’re faking it. The good news is that being yourself should be easier than working to a script—which is what you’ll have to do to some extent when inventing a corporate brand.
Fame can also be a benefit. It’s a two-edged sword for sure, but who’s going to deny that it’s nice for your ego to have a personal fan base? Who out there doesn’t enjoy a little bit of attention? Before you tell me that it’s not your thing, how often to you check Google Analytics to see how many people tuned into your last post! If you’ve never had your name on the door at an exclusive party, I’ve heard that it feels great to walk past the queue.
How you structure your brand... either as a personal brand or a more corporate feeling can have huge ramifications on down the road.
For instance, it is impossible to sell a personal brand. Don Giannatti has no value other than to me. Lighting Essentials can be something I could sell at some point down the road. Thinking through these and other questions are a good practice - especially if you haven't nailed down your branding strategy.
As many as 14 armed Orange County deputies, including narcotics agents, stormed Strictly Skillz barbershop during business hours on a Saturday in August, handcuffing barbers in front of customers during a busy back-to-school weekend.It was just one of a series of unprecedented raid-style inspections the Orange County Sheriff's Office recently conducted with a state regulating agency, targeting several predominantly black- and Hispanic-owned barbershops in the Pine Hills area.
In "sweeps" on Aug. 21 and Sept. 17 targeting at least nine shops, deputies arrested 37 people — the majority charged with "barbering without a license," a misdemeanor that state records show only three other people have been jailed in Florida in the past 10 years.
The operations were conducted without warrants, under the authority of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation inspectors, who can enter salons at will. Deputies said they found evidence of illegal activity, including guns, drugs and gambling. However, records show that during the two sweeps, and a smaller one in October, just three people were charged with anything other than a licensing violation.
Money quotes:
"...conducted with a state regulating agency,..."
Regulating agencies now have armed cops with the license to kill un-licensed barbers? What the hell is that about?
"...The operations were conducted without warrants, under the authority of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation inspectors, who can enter salons at will. ..."
Without Warrants? Hey all you 'civil rights' screamers and ACLU types that were freaked out about warrantless wiretapping of known terrorists get a friggin clue and do something about this. Without Warrants?
"The operations were conducted without warrants, under the authority of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation inspectors, who can enter salons at will. "
So that's it? That is a good use of community police? Unlicensed barbers. With guns drawn? Really?
In America?
Read the whole thing. It should make you sick... and angry.
The minuscule amount of drugs found does not make this something that we the American people should have to put up with. There was a crime here, for sure.
But not with 'unlicensed barbers'... my oh my.
The problem faced by this documentary film is common to all such works - which, unlike newspapers etc., must secure permission to quote when it uses news film clips, etc.
Yes it is. It is also true that every performance of Samuel Barber's Symphonies, and Eliot Carter's String Quartets carry a price as well. As does a play, musical, reprint of an article. There is a huge difference between quoting for an article and the use of material that MAKES the article.
Quotes and "Fair Use" have been with us for quit a while. Because the medium changes, some think that the ownership of the work and how it is used should change. While I agree there is room for compromise, I do not believe a wholesale move to the 'let me have it, I want it NOW' mantra is going to work all that well.
And telling me that some great historical item will be lost if the people who CREATED the work in it are to be paid is - well - falling a bit short on reality. If there is a market, there will be payment.
"The five-year licenses expired and the company that made the film also expired. And now we have a situation where we have this series for which there are no rights licenses. Eyes on the Prize cannot be broadcast on any TV venue anywhere, nor can it be sold."
That is really sad, and it would be wonderful if it could be saved.
But it is equally as sad that the people who say they care about such things cannot raise the money to keep it going. They can raise $50M for a slapstick movie about redneck car racers, or frat house kids dying a thousand different ways.
But they can't raise a crappy ass $500K?
The people who made the content need to be paid. And if it is such a wonderful film, why is no one trying to raise the money and get it back?
No.
The problem is that no one obviously thinks the film is worth $500K. I am not saying it is or it isn't, but for a lousy $500K they can renew it and no one can get that money together?
Why?
And why is that the fault of the people who created the works used in the film?
"And right now, the law is a serious hindrance to transmitting history and culture to new generations:"
Depends on which side of the creatin' and makin' you sit. If you are one wanting to make money off the sale of the film (somebody gotta be making some money - distribution, copies, packaging) then it is in your best interest to cut out any extraneous costs.
The people who put their lives and fortunes on the line to create the work you are discussing are not the place to cut.
I am not sure what will happen with all this "we gotta save the culture" stuff when it comes to IP, but ripping it away in the name of the culture seems short sighted, illogical and downright cruel to the creators.
Want more culture?
Create some yourself.
An unmanned aircraft that can fly a predetermined route costs a few hundred bucks to build and can be operated by iPhone.
Awesome. I want one of these.
No. I have no idea what I would use it for.
I just think they would be cool.
This summer, while promoting a new album that revived the name Hole (but without the group’s original members), Ms. Love, who has avidly embraced social media, introduced a Web site dedicated to her style that is intended to offset all of the horrific images of Courtney Love that result from entering that name into a Google search: Courtney with scarring on her over-plumped lips. Courtney with eyes that don’t line up. Courtney with corkscrew hair extensions. The site, whatcourtneyworetoday.com, shows endless, flattering pictures of Ms. Love playing dress-up in borrowed gowns and jewelry. In the last year, since she moved to New York from Los Angeles, she has surrounded herself with fashion designers, stylists and editors who have embraced her without concern for her unpredictable behavior. She has become a regular presence at fashion shows, movie screenings and parties, a walking quotation machine who is practically considered a beat by New York magazine.
Every once in a while I am reminded of how simply vacuous and un-entertaining so many 'entertainers are. This idiot is not worth the ink on one sheet of newsprint, but she gets a whole page in the NYT.
Aren't they the 'paper of record' who are supposed to be about the 'very important' amongst us? Soooo... this is who they think are very important?
Really.
"...since she moved to New York from Los Angeles, she has surrounded herself with fashion designers, stylists and editors who have embraced her without concern for her unpredictable behavior...."
That says so much doesn't it. Fashion designers and editors embracing her without any concern for the fact that she is a raving asshole?
Oh... she has money.
Yeah.
Just remember these are the same people who tell us that 'money isn't everything.'
What utter and total morons the elite class are.
The researchers hooked thermometers to the scrotums of 29 young men who were balancing a laptop on their knees. They found that even with a lap pad under the computer, the men's scrotums overheated quickly.
I am so glad they spent a ton of money researching something that ANY ASSHAT WHO EVER HAD A LAPTOP IN THEIR LAP KINDA FRIGGIN KNEW....
Jaysusssss, people!
But honestly Monica, the web is considered "public domain" and you should be happy we just didn't "lift" your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio. For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me! I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me... ALWAYS for free!"
Read the whole thing at http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/1553538.html - then pop on over to send a nice email to the nice lady who thinks that her world is one of lawful theft. There is a link to the magazine where the editor believes that it is OK to steal content. The magazine's name is 'Cooks Source" or Cooks Source.
Be nice with your emails. Be civil.
It isn't nice to attack people with obviously such slight grasp on reality.
And to think, she takes what she wants, lies about the copyright usage, then states that she should be paid for doing it.
Yeah... be very kind. She may actually be ill.
Quote:
"One way of paraphrasing this: If the resolution of your technical ability exceeds that of the resolution of your artistic ability, then you're out of focus and all you'll achieve are trivial pixel collections that no one other than you will care about"
-- Jan Klier, Photographer, Seattle
Well, yeah. That's about it, actually.
Quote:
"One way of paraphrasing this: If the resolution of your technical ability exceeds that of the resolution of your artistic ability, then you're out of focus and all you'll achieve are trivial pixel collections that no one other than you will care about"
-- Jan Klier, Photographer, Seattle
Well, yeah. That's about it, actually.